The Opposition in Indonesia: Institutional Alternatives for Change,

Abstract

The author concludes that, on balance, the New Order probably needs to be judged in rather better health than supposed. That health, furthermore, seems to be based on a curious phenomenon for a military/bureaucratic state --i.e., a consensus which exhibits breadth and flexibility, and yet is at the same time structured along patrimonial-populist lines. Does it--will it-all work? At present it looks as if the best answer is 'yes' as long as we don't make the mistake of judging the outcome solely on our own terms. He believes that there is even rather ample room for Western opinion influencing this particular Order, given its nature internally and its sensitivity to its world reputation as a civilized, modern, and respectable state in the family of nations. Human rights (though not precisely as the are understood in the United States) and basic needs economic development planning (though not entirely as Western formulations would have it) are strains of thinking that have already attracted a great deal of interest and are part of public discussion. But the way in which these and other subjects are promoted by outsiders will have to follow the contours of the Order and its underlying consensus, not because the government requires it but because that is what is likely to work most effectively.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA102580

Entities

People

  • William H. Frederick

Organizations

  • foreign affairs ministry

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Communities
  • Economic Development
  • Elections
  • Governments
  • Human Rights
  • Indonesia
  • Leadership
  • Literature
  • Observers
  • Periodicals
  • Political Parties
  • Political Systems
  • Social Sciences
  • Students
  • Thinking
  • United States
  • Urban Areas

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Educational Psychology
  • Strategic Security Studies