Some Observations on the Economics of 'Overdesigning' Rubble-Mound Structures with Concrete Armor.

Abstract

A cost comparison is made between two designs for a revetment-breakwater using concrete armor units. Both designs used the same type of unit (dolosse); however, two different stability coefficients were used in the designs. The comparisons shows that significant decreases in armor unit size may result in only insignificant cost savings and even cost increases for some conditions. This occurs because more smaller units are required to armor a given structure surface area, and any savings in material costs is offset by the increased cost of forming, stripping, and placing a greater number of smaller units. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA107240

Entities

People

  • J. Richard Weggel

Organizations

  • Coastal Engineering Research Center

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Breakwaters
  • Civil Engineering
  • Coastal Engineering
  • Coefficients
  • Concrete
  • Construction
  • Construction Equipment
  • Construction Materials
  • Economic Analysis
  • Economics
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Maintenance
  • Materials
  • Revetments
  • Shore Protection
  • United States

Readers

  • Geotechnical Engineering.
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis