National Military Strategy: Determinant, Resultant, or Figment.

Abstract

Secretary of Defense Harold Brown surveyed the one and one-half war strategy which has guided thinking about US general purpose force posture since 1969. His observations on the fundamental utility of what has served as US national strategy are revealing. 'Although, during the past decade, we never acquired all the readiness and mobility required by this strategy, we were not penalized for it because our potential enemies were relatively sluggish, and we were not put to the test by contingencies outside of Southeast Asia. But now times are changing.' Secretary Brown proposes a defense program which will begin to redress the shortfall in military forces needed to execute the national strategy; but as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General David Jones, observes the 'new system will not be available for many years.' Clearly, the hope is that the near term readiness measures which are being taken will suffice to protect US security interests.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA110068

Entities

People

  • David H. Roe

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Congress
  • Department Of Defense
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Foreign Policy
  • Game Theory
  • Governments
  • Military Organizations
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Personnel Management
  • Recreation
  • Students
  • United States
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies