Evidence against a Central Control Model of Timing in Typing.

Abstract

Terzuolo and Viviani, in widely cited research, propose a central control model of timing in typing, in which keystroke times are generated in parallel from centrally stored, word-specific timing patterns. Differences in overall time to type a given word are attributed to a multiplicative rate parameter, constant for a given typing of the word, but varying from one typing to another. Three major lines of evidence are cited for this model: (a) keystroke times expand or contract proportionally when words are typed slower or faster; (b) in a word; (c) the times to type a given digraph exhibit word-specific differences. My analyses show that (a) keystroke times do not expand proportionally; (b) the apparent constancy of variances is an artifact of the method that Terzuolo and Viviani used to transform the keystroke times; (c) the effects of surrounding character context are sufficient to explain differences in digraph latencies and these effects cross word boundaries, showing that they are not word-specific. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA110294

Entities

People

  • Donald R. Gentner

Organizations

  • University of California, San Diego

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • California
  • Cognition
  • Computer Programming
  • Contrast
  • Experimental Data
  • Information Processing
  • Judgment
  • Mental Processes
  • Military Research
  • Motor Skills
  • Perception
  • Personal Computers
  • Psychology
  • Scientific Research
  • Simulations
  • Universities

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Database Systems and Applications
  • Image Processing and Computer Vision.
  • Systems Analysis and Design