Evaluating the Relative Effectiveness of Different Structuring and Weighting Techniques for Multi-Attribute Value Assessment.

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the relative effectiveness of different structuring and weighting techniques for Multi-Attribute Value Assessment (MAVA). In particular, the first experiment evaluated the relative effectiveness of two techniques for structuring the MAVA hierarchy; the second experiment evaluated the relative effectiveness of five techniques for obtaining an individual's weights on attributes in the hierarchy; and the third experiment evaluated the relative effectiveness of two weighting techniques, in conjunction with two discussion techniques, for obtaining group weights on attributes in the hierarchy. In all three experiments, the participants were second lieutenants in the U.S. Marine Corps who had completed their training at The Basic School. The external criterion was the MAVA model for the ATTACK Mission Performance Standard (MPS) in the Marine Corps Combat Readiness Evaluation System (MCCRES).

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1982
Accession Number
ADA111543

Entities

People

  • Leonard Adelman
  • Michael L. Donnell
  • Paul J. Sticha

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Combat Readiness
  • Data Science
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Information Processing
  • Information Science
  • Marine Corps Training
  • Materials
  • Military Research
  • Psychology
  • Regression Analysis
  • Standards
  • Students
  • Training
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.