A Predictive Validity Study of an Assessment Center for Research and Development Supervisors.

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the predictive validity of the 1974-1975 Aeronautical Systems Division (ASD) Management Assessment Center conducted at Wright-Patterson AFB OH. The assessment center method is reviewed with an emphasis on the 1974-1975 ASD assessment center background, construction, and usage. As an adjunct to the understanding of assessment centers, predictors, criteria, and the predictive validity concept are reviewed. A previous study of the predictive validity conducted in 1980 concluded that the ASD assessment center is a valid predictor of managerial effectiveness. Although the results of the 1980 study were statistically significant, they did not achieve expected validity levels. Based on those results and a review of criteria, alternate criteria were developed for the measurement of managerial effectiveness. These criteria were incorporated into an interview and questionnaire which were given to the supervisors of a sample group of individuals who participated in the ASD assessment center. Using the information from these interview/questionnaires, a predictive validity study was conducted. Results of this study do not support the 1980 study nor do they confirm the predictive validity of the assessment center. Based on these results, additional research on this subject is recommended. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA112121

Entities

People

  • Kevin K. Rankin

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Business Administration
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Databases
  • Factor Analysis
  • Information Science
  • Management Personnel
  • Measurement
  • Military Organizations
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychological Tests
  • Psychology
  • Ratings
  • Regression Analysis
  • Supervision
  • Surveys
  • Systems Management

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.