Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparative Analysis between Army and Navy Officers

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of how four groups of officers view organizational effectiveness. The four groups that were surveyed include Human Resource Management Specialists (Navy), Organizational Effectiveness Management Consultants (Army), surface warfare officers (Navy), and combat arms officers (Army). The instrument used to collect the data was a modification of the Navy's Human Resource Management Survey (Fleet). The modification to the survey required these officers to describe organizational states which they believed were reflective of an 'effective organization.' The original Fleet survey merely asked officers to describe what their organizations looked like now, not how they believed they should look. Sixty of the original eighty-eight questions were modified from the Navy's survey. An additional forty questions were added to these sixty questions in order to evaluate leadership styles. These forty questions were modified from Fleishman's leadership questionnaire. Comparative analyses were conducted among groups to determine if significant differences existed.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA112314

Entities

People

  • Arthur G. Maxwell Jr
  • Mark M. Gettys

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Business Administration
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Science
  • New York
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Political Systems
  • Prejudice
  • Second World War
  • Societies
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Students
  • Training Management
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Organizational Psychology.