Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Assist Top-Level Acquisition Decision-Making

Abstract

Top-level acquisition decisions are complex and multi-objective. This implies difficulties in appropriately accounting for all relevant factors to select the best alternative. In addition, there are difficulties and deficiencies in the actual implementation of the decision process. The difficulties and deficiencies in the top-level acquisition decision-making are explored by this thesis. The thesis suggests improvements through intensive use of quantitative, judgment-based decision technique derived from Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). Emphasis is put on demonstrating MAUT's capability for incorporating subjective judgment, in order to reduce the existing doubts about its usefulness for top-level decision-making. The thesis recommends use of the MAUT procedure as the central tool for comprehensive evaluation of the decision alternatives. It argues that such use would solve some of the essential decision-making problems and in addition contribute to the quality and efficiency of the decision process.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA112937

Entities

People

  • Ran Goren

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Business Administration
  • Decision Support Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Engineering
  • Governments
  • Helicopters
  • Judgment
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Procurement
  • Public Policy
  • Questionnaires
  • Social Sciences
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Systems Analysis and Design