Public and Private Sector Managers: Are They Really That Different?

Abstract

Since passage of the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act, which mandated new systems for executive selection, development, and performance appraisal, the importance of describing managerial and executive jobs in the public sector has increased. This recent attention to the public sector also emphasizes the relevance of comparing managerial jobs in the public and private sectors. This study compared high-level public sector Navy civilian executives (GS-16, 17, 18, or equivalent public law positions) and private sector managers and executives in terms of job content, job characteristics, and perceptions of the skills required for effective job performance. Results indicate that (1) managers in both sectors were very similar in rating job content, (2) both groups of managers indicate that they do not have time for reflective, systematic planning, and (3) public and private sector managers agree on their assessment of the required characteristics that are necessary for effective job performance. Findings suggest that a considerable degree of overlap exists between the two sectors with respect to characteristics that should be assessed when selecting, appraising, or training managerial employees. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1982
Accession Number
ADA114021

Entities

People

  • Alan W. Lau
  • Arthur R. Newman
  • Cynthia M. Pavett

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Applied Psychology
  • Business Administration
  • California
  • Employment
  • Engineering
  • Executives
  • Management Personnel
  • Management Training
  • Military Research
  • Organizational Structure
  • Performance Appraisals
  • Personality
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychological Phenomena And Processes
  • Surveys
  • Training
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Business
  • Political science

Readers

  • Occupational Health and Safety.
  • Organizational Process Management (OPM).
  • Theoretical Analysis.