Choice of Response Surface Design and Alphabetic Optimality.

Abstract

It is argued that the specification of problem of experimental design (and in particular, of response surface design) should depend on scientific context. The specification for a widely developed theory of 'alphabetic optimality' for response surface applications is analyzed and found to be unduly limiting. Ways in which designs might be chosen to satisfy a set of criteria of greater scientific relevance are suggested. Detailed consideration is given to regions of operability and interest, to the design information function, to sensitivity of criteria to size and shape of the region, and to the effect of bias. Problems are discussed of checking for lack of fit, sequential assembly, orthogonal blocking, estimation of error, estimation of transformations, robustness to bad values, using minimum numbers of points, and employing simple data patterns. (author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1982
Accession Number
ADA114550

Entities

People

  • George E. P. Box

Organizations

  • University of Wisconsin–Madison

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anhydrides
  • Assembly
  • Chemical Reactions
  • Combinatorial Analysis
  • Data Science
  • Experimental Design
  • Factorial Design
  • Information Science
  • Mathematics
  • Operations Research
  • Sensitivity
  • Specifications
  • Statistics
  • Surveys
  • United States
  • Universities
  • Wisconsin

Readers

  • Regression Analysis.
  • Software Engineering.