Factors Favoring Military Unions in the United States Armed Forces.

Abstract

The paper examines three questions: Should members of the Armed Forces be denied the right to collectively bargain when Federal civilian employees can? Do military unions degrade morale, discipline or combat effectiveness of Armed Forces? Is PL 95-610 (denying the right of military members to join unions) constitutional? The thesis is that the military members should not be denied this right. The fact that they are, is based on a presumpt of that unions would undermine command authority and present a clear threat to morale and readiness. A review of unionized armed forces of a number of European countries, however, refutes this contention. In fact, military unions have generally been a force for solving problems without ill effect. As to the legality of PL95-610, it is still an unknown as the law has not been challenged in the courts. Unionization of the US Armed Forces is a dormant issue, but not a dead one. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 19, 1982
Accession Number
ADA116753

Entities

People

  • Thomas P. Easum Jr

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Congress
  • Employment
  • Freedom Of Speech
  • Government Employees
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Personnel
  • National Security
  • Negotiations
  • Personnel Management
  • Public Administration
  • Students
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Economics
  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Strategic Security Studies