A Comparison of Barrel-Heating Processes for Granular and Stick Propellant Charges.

Abstract

The natural flow channels offered by propelling charges composed of bundles of stick propellant significantly reduce the resistance to gas flow when compared to that of granular propellant charges, virtually eliminating potentially damaging pressure waves in the gun chamber. However, this same feature which reduces pressure waves may also result in more propellant remaining in the chamber, burning behind the origin of rifling, and perhaps increasing barrel erosion. In this study, a two-phase flow interior ballistic code (NOVA) is employed to compare propellant motion and heat transfer processes for ballistically-equivalent stick and granular propellant charges. A large difference in the motion of the solid phase during ignition and combustion is predicted for the two configurations, leading ultimately to an approximately 300 K higher maximum wall temperature for the stick propellant charge.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 1982
Accession Number
ADA118394

Entities

People

  • Albert W. Horst

Organizations

  • Ballistic Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Artillery
  • Boundary Layer
  • California
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Equations
  • Fluid Flow
  • Gas Flow
  • Heat Transfer
  • Howitzers
  • Jet Propulsion
  • Military Research
  • Munitions
  • Physics Laboratories
  • Propellants
  • Propelling Charges
  • Surface Temperature

Fields of Study

  • Physics

Readers

  • Combustion and Flow Dynamics.
  • ballistics.