Command Criminal Responsibility: A Plea for a Workable Standard

Abstract

Professional conduct on the battlefield is the heart of military professionalism. The need for appropriate articulation of expected battlefield conduct is the theme of this project. The unresolved issues and nonexistence of inarticulateness of the current standards are explored using as a medium the Medina case which arose from the tragic My Lai incident. Current standards are compared with standards found in the new proposed Protocols to the Geneva Conventions. Prior to examining these standards, command criminal responsibility is defined, reasons for its examination are explored, and the timeliness of its debate is discussed. The objective of this essay is to examine its international and domestic aspects of command criminal responsibility in an effort to facilitate understanding and intelligent dialogue between commanders and lawyers. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 25, 1982
Accession Number
ADA118834

Entities

People

  • William G. Eckhardt

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Criminals
  • Geneva Conventions
  • Health Services
  • Humanities
  • International Law
  • Judgment
  • Law
  • Military Personnel
  • New York
  • Personnel Management
  • Second World War
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • Vietnam War
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Systems Analysis and Design