Korea in Postwar U.S. Security Policy,

Abstract

Historically, Korea has had a strategic importance far out of proportion to its size. This importance was linked for centuries to the competition between Japan and China for control over the peninsula. In the post-World War II period, Korea's importance has stemmed from its geopolitical position at the intersection of conflicting great power interests in East Asia. In this period, the United States and the Soviet Union became the central actors. Throughout the post-war period, however, the United States has vacillated in its appreciation of Korea's strategic importance, and in its estimation of Korea's value in terms of U.S. global strategy. This has given U.S. security policy toward Korea a basic quality of ambivalence. It has also allowed U.S. policy to fluctuate between the extremes of intervention and with-drawal, leaving in its wake a sense of ambiguity regarding America's fundamental commitment to the defense of Korea. As we proceed through the 1980s, the task for policymakers is to provide a coherent and consistent policy toward the security of Korea. The purpose of this paper is to take a step in this direction.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1982
Accession Number
ADA121223

Entities

People

  • Norman D. Levin
  • Richard L. Sneider

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Birds
  • Boats
  • Congress
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of State
  • Far East
  • Foreign Relations
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Landing Craft
  • Military Budgets
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Navy
  • Treaties
  • United States
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • International Relations, focusing on Korea-Africa and North Korea-South Korea relations, and Nigeria-Latin American Relations.
  • Strategic Security Studies