Comments on 'Defense Planning in Turkey,' By Michael Moodie,

Abstract

Mr Moodie's paper on defense planning in Turkey impresses me as a thorough and competent job. I want to focus my comments on a few additional points. One of the things I miss in Mr. Moodie's good paper is a sufficient sense of the special strategic and geopolitical importance of Turkey in the world scene. The next general point I want to make concerns the relationship between defense planning and military efforts in Turkey on the one hand, and TurKey's economic development, on the other. Mr. Moodie's refers to the potential need and use of theatre nuclear forces as alternative to conventional reinforcement from NATO. I disagree with this formulation. There are numerous opportunities for enhancing Turkish conventional capabilities through advanced technology systems that are also manpower-intensive, e.g., small and light, individually operated anti-tank weapons; surface-to-air missile systems with similar light and individually operated characteristics. Finally, I want to raise what I think is a central problem, as well as an opportunity from the U.S. point of view, to relate the general issue of defense planning in less industrialized states to certain major issues of U.S. defense and foreign policy in the world at large.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1982
Accession Number
ADA121225

Entities

People

  • Charles Wolf, Jr

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anti-Tank Weapons
  • Conventional Capabilities
  • Defense Planning
  • Demography
  • Economic Development
  • Education
  • Foreign Policy
  • Manpower
  • Middle East
  • Military Equipment
  • Military Training
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Rapid Deployment
  • Southeast Asia
  • Training
  • United States
  • Ussr

Readers

  • Economics
  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Strategic Security Studies