Arms Control Verification: 'Bridge' Theories and the Politics of Expediency.

Abstract

Seldom do American political leaders discuss modern arms control without reference to the seemingly inseparable issue of compliance verification. Although 'verification' has a variety of potential meanings, it has long been regarded as the central determinant of good or bad security agreements from a Western perspective. Every American president during the postwar era has observed both the importance of nuclear arms control and the impossibility of its realization without adequate provisions for compliance verification. Part I describes the political chasm separating a closed and traditionally deceptive Soviet system from an open American system that is politically and ethically committed to arms control. Part II reviews various scientific, technical, and legal theories according to which monitoring mechanisms, dignified by treaty language, were said to 'bridge' this political chasm. Part III discusses the consequences of these guidelines to policy and evaluate their effectiveness in implementing the various treaties and agreements they have licensed.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1983
Accession Number
ADA135439

Entities

People

  • R. J. Desutter Jr

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Birds
  • Employment
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Political Systems
  • Public Policy
  • Recreation
  • Treaties
  • Warning Systems

Readers

  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies