Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability with and without Response Bias.

Abstract

This article presents methods for assessing agreement among the judgments made by a single group of judges on a single variable in regard to a single target. For example, the group of judges could be editorial consultants, members of an assessment center, or members of a team. The single target could be a manuscript, a lower-level manager, or a team. The variable on which the target is judged could be overall publishability in the case of the manuscript, managerial potential for the lower-level manager, or team cooperativeness for the team. The methods presented are based on new procedures for estimating interrater reliability. For situations such as the above, these procedures are shown to furnish more accurate and interpretable estimates of agreement than estimates provided by procedures commonly used to estimate agreement, consistency, or interrater reliability. In addition, the proposed methods include processes for controlling for the spurious influences of response biases (e.g., positive leniency, social desirability) on estimates of interrater reliability. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 09, 1983
Accession Number
ADA136709

Entities

People

  • G. Wolf
  • L. R. James
  • R. G. Demaree

Organizations

  • Georgia Tech

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Computations
  • Consistency
  • Contracts
  • Data Science
  • Human Behavior
  • Information Processing
  • Information Science
  • Judgment
  • Management Personnel
  • Measurement
  • Military Research
  • New York
  • Psychology
  • Schools
  • Training

Readers

  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Regression Analysis.
  • Technical Research and Report Writing.