Organizational Process and Combat Readiness: Feasibility of Training Organizational Effectiveness Staff Officers to Assess Command Group Performance

Abstract

This report describes the results of the first phase of a project concerned with research on the relationship between performance of certain critical organizational processes and combat readiness of U.S. Army units. The research in Phase I was devoted to analysis of the relationship between process performance of battalion command groups and the combat outcomes of battle simulations in which the battalions participated and determination of the feasibility of training Organizational Effectiveness Staff Officers (OESO) to observe and assess the process performance of TOE unit battle staffs and to feedback their observations so that improved performance would result. The results indicated that a positive relationship (correlation = .67) between organizational process performance and combat outcomes did exist, and also that it is possible to successfully train OESOs. Caution must be observed concerning these results since the sample sizes (twelve battalions and two OESOs) were very small. These results serve as a foundation for work to be accomplished in Phase II concerned with training command groups and battle staffs to improve their process performance and, thus, to enhance combat readiness.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA138881

Entities

People

  • B. L. Elder
  • John M. Forsyth
  • Joseph A. Olmstead

Organizations

  • Human Resources Research Organization

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Army
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Climate Change
  • Combat Effectiveness
  • Combat Operations
  • Combat Readiness
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Control Systems
  • Human Resources
  • Military Research
  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Task Forces
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Military Science
  • Organizational Psychology.