Command Vehicle Choice during Field Training Exercises: Problems and Proposed Solutions

Abstract

Research investigated the extent to which Armor company commanders' use of their tanks as command vehicles during field training exercises is inconsistent with the doctrinal statement of the US Army Armor School. Questionnaire responses of Armor and Armored Cavalry officers identified several factors contributing to command vehicle choice and indicated reactions to proposed product improvements to aid command, control, and communication (C3) functions in a tank Armor officers reported little use of the M60 tank as a command vehicle during field training exercises. Responses revealed apparent misunderstanding of doctrine related to command vehicle choice, and demonstrated that Armor officers acknowledge the necessity of training C3 functions in tanks. Officers surveyed responded favorabily to suggested product improvements intended to facilitate C3 functions in the areas of communications, navigation, and workspace human factors.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1983
Accession Number
ADA139790

Entities

People

  • B. L. Kottas
  • D. W. Bessemer

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Armored Personnel Carriers
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Command And Control
  • Control Panels
  • Doctrine
  • Fire Extinguishers
  • Guns
  • Insensitive Explosives
  • Navigation
  • Radio Equipment
  • Radio Transmission
  • Range Finders
  • Rear Areas
  • Social Sciences
  • Training
  • Training Management
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Science
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control