An Optimization Methodology for Multi-Criteria Comparison Using Response Surface Methods and Mathematical Programming.

Abstract

The maxima/minima of one response surface (measure of effectiveness, MOE) is calculated when the domain is constrained by consecutive levels (aspirations) of a second response surface. Thus, the optimal trade-off between the two responses (MOE's) is displayed over an entire operating domain, providing new and unique capabilities to evaluate options. The study applies this development to a strategic force structure modeled in a linear programming model. The methodology determines the optimal force structure to maximize one MOE given the aspiration levels of the other MOE. Therefore, the decision maker has the optimal force structures to achieve a range of demands/aspirations and also maximize the second goal. The methodology has applications to multicriteria optimization when relatively large numbers of domain control variable combinations are involved. This technique may be a tool to design the optimal weapon system characteristics or choose the optimal mix of weapon types to fulfill dual mission requirements. This work is an extension of previous work which used response surfaces, experimental design, and mathematical programming to conduct multi-dimensional, sensitivity analysis and weapon system comparisons. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1984
Accession Number
ADA141169

Entities

People

  • R. E. Graney

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Computer Programming
  • Computer Programs
  • Computers
  • Data Science
  • Databases
  • Experimental Design
  • Force Structure
  • Information Science
  • Linear Programming
  • Literature Surveys
  • Mathematical Programming
  • Multiobjective Optimization
  • Operations Research
  • Optimization
  • Regression Analysis
  • Two Dimensional
  • Weapon Systems

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Operations Research