A Comparison of Two Acoustic Parabolic Transmisssion Loss Models for Compatibility with the Wavenumber Technique in the Determination of Source Depth.

Abstract

The Brock version of the Split-Step Fast Fourier Transform (SSFFT) and the Jeager version of the Implicit Finite Difference (IFD) acoustic parabolic equation models are compared with a Lloyd mirror interference pattern in the range domain. The SSFFT displays the inability to place the transmission loss nulls at the correct ranges. It is also unable to utilize bottom loss information correctly. The IFD produced nulls at the correct ranges; however, it inserted an unacceptable amount of noise except when small (1 m) vertical grid steps were used and the pressure release bottom was placed at extended depths. In shallow water cases, the IFD is able to properly represent the pressure information. Each model is explored in the wavenumber domain by use of a 'Wavenumber Technique' (WT) model with emphasis on source depth determination. The source depth may be determined by measuring the distance between the equally spaced nulls in the wavenumber representation.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1984
Accession Number
ADA143079

Entities

People

  • J. L. Blanchard Ii

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acoustic Propagation
  • Acoustic Signals
  • Acoustic Waves
  • Acoustics
  • Attenuation
  • Bottom Bounce
  • Computer Programs
  • Computers
  • Crystal Structure
  • Equations
  • Fast Fourier Transforms
  • Plastic Explosives
  • Shallow Water
  • Sound Waves
  • Transmission Loss
  • United States
  • Water Masses

Readers

  • Acoustical Oceanography.
  • Electromagnetic Wave Scattering and Antenna Radiation Engineering
  • Wave Propagation and Nonlinear Chaotic Dynamics.

Technology Areas

  • Space