A Comparison of Nomex and Evolution 3 for Use in Tent Liners

Abstract

The fabrics Nomex and Evolution 3 were examined and their physical properties relevant to use in tent liners were compared. In general, Nomex was found to be superior to Evolution 3 for use in tent liners. The Nomex samples were lighter, less voluminous, stronger, more flame retardent, and had a lower water-vapour resistance than the Evolution 3 samples. Evolution 3 absorbed less water than did Nomex. The poor flammability properties of the Evolution 3 was its principal defect. The insulating benefits of tent liners made of either material were found to be comparable. Originator-supplied keywords include: Material properties, Strength, and Thermal resistance.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1983
Accession Number
ADA149057

Entities

People

  • B. Cain

Organizations

  • Defence Research and Development Canada

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Sensors

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Aramid Fibers
  • Boundary Layer
  • Classification
  • Combustion
  • Composite Materials
  • Contracts
  • Field Tests
  • Flammability
  • Heat Energy
  • Materials
  • Physical Properties
  • Resistance
  • Security
  • Test Methods
  • Thermal Resistance
  • Thickness

Readers

  • Materials Science
  • Mechanical Engineering/Mechanics of Materials.
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Microelectronics