Army Study Highlights. Volume 5.

Abstract

The principal findings of this study were: (1) USACE does not provide adequate individual training in mobilization roles and missions. (2) Most USACE managers are unsure about how to remove construction constraints under emergency conditions. (3) Mobilization planning is not well coordinated among other Federal and non-Federal agencies, particularly at the regional level. (4) Mobilization staffing, material resources, and funding are not well provided for. (5) Mobilization requirements are not clearly defined. (6) The distinction between full and total mobilization is unclear. (7) The Direct Support/General Support District concept may be ineffective. (8) Existing and planned ADP systems are not designed to operate effectively under mobilization conditions. (9) Plans for maintaining the physical security of USACE facilities during a mobilization are inadequate. (10) There is a perception that USACE does not provide enough command emphasis and guidance for mobilization planning.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 1984
Accession Number
ADA149177

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Cost Analysis
  • Employment
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Lessons Learned
  • Logistics
  • Management Personnel
  • Operations Research
  • Organizational Structure
  • Procurement
  • Program Management
  • Students
  • Systems Analysis
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Training
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Defense Financial Management and Audit.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.