Setting Enlistment Standards and Matching Recruits to Jobs Using Job Performance Criteria.

Abstract

Every year the military services are faced with the tremendous tasks of choosing 300,000 new recruits from among the larger number who are willing to serve, and of deciding in which specialty each of the 300,000 should be trained. This report describes a study largely concerned with determining whether there is any objective basis for enlistment standards and for matching recruits to jobs.It develops a cost/performance tradeoff model that appears to be a useful tool for setting job standards and for prescribing appropriate service-wide standards, but finds that three questions must be answered before the model can be used objectively. A key element of the model is the 'qualified man-month', a single performance measure that combines attrition and job performance information. A related Rand report, Recruit Aptitudes and Army Job Performance: Setting Enlistment Standards for Infantrymen, provides useful background to this report. Key words include: Performance (Human), Enlisted personnel, and Aptitude tests.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1984
Accession Number
ADA150821

Entities

People

  • J. B. Garfinkle
  • R. L. Fernandez

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Active Duty
  • Artillery
  • Attrition
  • Business Administration
  • Computer Programming
  • Education
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Health Services
  • Linear Programming
  • Maintenance
  • Management Personnel
  • Medical Personnel
  • Personnel Management
  • Recruiting
  • Recruits
  • Standards
  • Training

Readers

  • Naval Personnel Management
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Systems Analysis and Design