Preliminary Evaluation of an Improved Flammability Test Method for Aircraft Materials.

Abstract

Small-scale flammability test methods were evaluated by comparing data obtained on a series of interior honey-comb panels with fire test results obtained with a 1/4-scale cabin model. Generally, the vertical Bunsen burner, limiting oxygen index and radiant panel test methods ranked the phenolic-faced panels higher (better performance) than the epoxy-faced panels. It appears as if these test methods, which employ employ relatively moderate exposure conditions, are reflecting the superior ignition resistance of the phenolics over the epoxies. Thus, these tests cannot predict the performance of materials that exhibit high burning rates when subjected to heating conditions used in the Ohio State University (OSU) apparatus, however, can be set at higher levels. At 5 watts/sq cm, rank ordering materials based on peak heat release rate measured via oxygen depletion in the OSU apparatus agreed with materials ranking in the 1/4-scale model. Based on the scope of this investigation, the OSU apparatus operated at these conditions and employing oxygen depletion calorimetry is the recommended improved fire test method for interior panels.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1984
Accession Number
ADA151075

Entities

People

  • A. Abramowitz
  • C. P. Sarkos
  • R. A. Filipczak

Organizations

  • Federal Aviation Administration

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aircraft Panels
  • Aircrafts
  • Burning Rate
  • Combustion
  • Combustion Products
  • Epoxy Resins
  • Fires
  • Flow Rate
  • Heat Flux
  • Laboratory Tests
  • Materials
  • Materials Laboratories
  • Materials Testing
  • Measurement
  • Model Tests
  • Passenger Aircraft
  • Test Methods

Readers

  • Combustion science or combustion engineering.
  • Regression Analysis.
  • Thermal Physics or Thermal Science.