Processes Involved in Writing Effective Procedural Instructions.

Abstract

This study examined instruction writing, seeking to distinguish effective from ineffective writers in terms of the processes they use. The study involved four phases: (1) observing 16 writers composing a set of instructions for one of two procedural tasks--item assembly and knot tying; (2) identifying effective instructions through user testing; (3) observing writers revising their own instructions, first before, then after viewing a videotaped user; (4) identifying effective revisions through user testing. Effective writers tended to define more problems related to selecting information (e.g., assessing informational sufficiency, level of detail, need for feedback). They also tended to test the adequacy of information by anticipating users' responses at choice points in their emerging texts. Originator supplied keywords include: Authoring; Discourse; Technical documentation; Linguistics; Psycholinguistics; Technical writing; Text.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 28, 1985
Accession Number
ADA152083

Entities

People

  • A. M. Rose
  • R. A. Dean
  • S. L. Dory
  • V. M. Holland

Organizations

  • American Institutes for Research

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computer Science
  • Education
  • Language
  • Linguistics
  • Military Research
  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Students
  • Technical Writing
  • Thinking
  • Training
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Computational Linguistics
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.