Passing Fancies: Plus Ca Change,

Abstract

The intellectual and professional underpinnings of the policy sciences have been well-articulated for at least thirty years. But, perhaps like any emerging discipline, its track has not been true in any linear sense of the term. Divergencies rather than direction--meanderings in lieu of milestones--have marked its travels. Its erratic intellectual growth has seemingly been diverted and diffused by a number of factors which have deflected it from the original goals and objectives that Lasswell, Dror, and its other early proponents foresaw it attaining. One thus needs to ask what has motivated and shaped the growth of the policy sciences. What trends and conditions have influenced their development as both a discipline and profession? This paper attempts to inventory the development of the policy sciences and their determinants by employing a Lasswellian framework.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1984
Accession Number
ADA152560

Entities

People

  • P. Deleon

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Economic Analysis
  • Economics
  • Governments
  • Law
  • National Governments
  • New York
  • Operations Research
  • Political Ideologies
  • Political Science
  • Political Theory
  • Psychology
  • Public Administration
  • Public Policy
  • Social Problems
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Systems Analysis

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Educational Psychology
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.