Combatting Terrorism Becomes a War

Abstract

Military operations in response to terrorism are likely to involve a handful of hostile countries in the Third World where the United States has incontrovertible evidence that agents in the employ of a government have carried out a terrorist attack, that a government has instigated a terrorist attack or permitted one to occur through willful negligence, or that a government is able to bring the perpetrators to justice but refuses to do so. If we apply these criteria to the hundreds of terrorist attacks directed against the United States in the last decade, a military response might have been contemplated in only a handful of episodes--less than one percent: the holding of American hostages in Teheran, but none of the other takeovers of American embassies; if it had come about, the assassination of American officials by hit teams from Libya; the bombings of the American embassy and the American Marine Headquarters in Beirut. Finally, the critics point out, the conflict does not end if and when we strike back. Retaliatory operations may only generate further terrorist attack, requiring further military action. Would this not divert us from whatever original foreign policy goal being pursued?

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1984
Accession Number
ADA152772

Entities

People

  • B. M. Jenkins

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Assassination
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Foreign Policy
  • Governments
  • Military Operations
  • Social Sciences
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.