User Understanding.

Abstract

This document explores some ideas about how much understanding a user needs to perform skillfully using a device. I suggest a framework for characterizing user understanding and discuss the role of understanding in performance and learning. I propose that (a) the level at which a user interacts with a device is determined by the tasks being performed, (b) the device's functions and structures that are understood differ from level to level, and (c) a uniform set of criteria is appropriate for evaluating understanding at any level. The criteria concern three aspects of a USER's knowledge about a device: 1)Coherence - are the components of the user's knowledge related in an integrated structure; 2) Validity - does the user's knowledge reflect the actual behavior of the device?; and 3) Integration - to what extent is the user's knowledge about a device tied to other components of a user's knowledge? The author discusses how Coherence, Validity, and Integration facilitate learning, improve the efficiency, flexibility, and reliability of performance, provide predictive and explanatory power, increase the likelihood that procedures will be remembered or can be regenerated, and enable the transfer of skills. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1985
Accession Number
ADA157155

Entities

People

  • M. S. Riley

Organizations

  • University of California, San Diego

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • California
  • Classification
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Cognitive Systems Engineering
  • Computers
  • Electronics
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Human-Computer Interfaces
  • Human-Machine Interaction
  • Language
  • New York
  • Psychology
  • Students

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Systems Analysis and Design