A Comparison of Dichotic Listening Task Scoring Methods.

Abstract

In a recent evaluation of two dichotic listening tasks (DLTs) as predictors of performance in Naval Aviation Undergraduate Pilot Training, results based on one of five scoring methods were presented. The purpose of this report is to provide DLT performance scores using all five scoring methods for comparative purposes to determine the scoring system most economical and efficient for automated scoring and, most sensitive to individual and mean differences. Five scoring methods are described which vary primarily in their treatments of errors, and in their consideration of the importance of sequence effects. Five independent analyses of previously reported data were performed. Results were nearly invariant across all five methods; i.e., intercorrelations among scores across scoring techniques exceeded 0.90. Two of the scoring methods are recommended for purposes of standardizing future analyses of DLT performance, one because of its simplicity and ease of application and the other, because it may have greater sensitivity to differences in individual performance.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1985
Accession Number
ADA159920

Entities

People

  • G. R. Griffin
  • J. D. Mosko

Organizations

  • Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aviation Personnel
  • Biomedical Research
  • Classification
  • Delphi Method
  • Flight Training
  • Intrusion
  • Marine Corps
  • Naval Air Stations
  • Naval Aviation
  • Navy
  • Pilots
  • Security
  • Sound Pressure
  • Standards
  • Students
  • Training

Readers

  • Approximation Theory.
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.