An Investigation of Construction Contract Dispute Cases Lost at the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Level.

Abstract

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) is responsible for resolving contract disputes between the Armed Services and Civilian Contractors. The invent of this thesis is to examine those Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Level (ASBCA) cases that were resolved in the favor of the contractor to determine if a pattern of problem areas exist among construction contract disputes or if there is a single claim category that is predominant among the population of cases lost by the government. A total of thirty-one disputed construction cases were examined in this study. Each examined case was heard before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Level (ASBCA) during the period between 1982 and 1985. The particulars relevant to each case were recorded on a case review form and analyzed. The results of the analysis indicate that disputes related to specifications are overwhelmingly the most frequent occurring claim. As such, recommendations are provide that will contribute to the minimization of discrepancies related to specifications.

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1985
Accession Number
ADA160868

Entities

People

  • R. A. Smith

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Construction
  • Contractors
  • Contracts
  • Governments
  • Specifications

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Government Contracting/Procurement.