Active Design Reviews: Principles and Practices.

Abstract

Although many new software design techniques have emerged in the past 15 years, there have been few changes to the procedures for reviewing the designs produced using these techniques. This report describes an improved technique, based on the following ideas, for reviewing designs: The efforts of each reviewer should be focused on those aspects of the design that suit his or her experience and expertise; The characteristics of the reviewers needed should be explicitly specified before reviewers are selected; Reviewers should be ased to make positive assertions about the design rather than simply allowed to point out defects; The designers pose questions to the reviewers, rather than vice versa. These questions are posed on a set of questionnaires that requires careful study of aspect of the design; and Interaction between designers and reviewers occurs in small meetings involving two to four people rather than meetings of large groups.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 18, 1985
Accession Number
ADA163188

Entities

People

  • David L. Parnas
  • David M. Weiss

Organizations

  • United States Naval Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • C4I
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Aircrafts
  • Availability
  • Avionics
  • Classification
  • Computer Programming
  • Computers
  • Consistency
  • Engineering
  • Military Research
  • Questionnaires
  • Security
  • Software Design
  • Software Development
  • Specifications
  • Standards

Readers

  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Theoretical Analysis.