Bradley Vehicle: Concerns about the Army's Vulnerability Testing

Abstract

The results of the Phase I tests by themselves cannot be used to determine the Bradley's vulnerability in actual combat conditions. In evaluating statements by Army officials that the Bradley performed better than expected in the tests, it should be recognized that (1) certain shots, which could have caused severe damage to the vehicle and crew, were avoided, (2) some of the most current threat simulants were not used, and (3) the infantry version, which is more susceptible to larger numbers of casualties, was not tested. Although the tests provide insight into the Bradley's vulnerability, key questions remain that cannot be answered by the test results alone. Critical data from the Army's vulnerability models is also needed to properly assess the Bradley's vulnerability. This data was available after Phase I tests but only a limited amount was used in preparing the Department of Defense's report. The Army informed us that more updated vulnerability information on the Bradley will be furnished to the Congress after the second series of tests.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 14, 1986
Accession Number
ADA166053

Entities

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Ammunition
  • Anti-Tank Missiles
  • Armored Personnel Carriers
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Department Of Defense
  • Explosives
  • Fire Extinguishers
  • Fire Suppression
  • Guided Missiles
  • High Explosives
  • Infantry Fighting Vehicles
  • Munitions
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • Vehicles
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Cybersecurity.
  • Military Science
  • Strategic Security Studies