The Family Survey as a Diagnostic Instrument

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to document analyses done to make refinements in an instrument previously used for a May 1983 survey of 1,036 Army couples in the U. S. Army in Europe. The analyses were performed to determine strengths and weaknesses of the instrument, as well as to examine implications for use of data obtained from such an instrument. Sections of the instrument were assessed to determine whether the sections constituted actual scales. Results include reliability coefficients and relationships among the scales determined by factor analysis, intercorrelation, and step-wise regression. Results were examined in light of suggested refinements for the instrument, if it or sections of it are used in such research in the future. Recommendations include 1) future use of scales to analyze family bonding, strengths or weaknesses which have literature giving us the psychometric properties, and known relationships to other constructs, 2) revising items from the Family Index of Coherence to form a commitment to the Army scale, 3) using the literature on the psychological sense of community to develop scales for this variable, 4) using a known scale for job satisfaction, and %) designing the next survey instrument so that multivariate scores can be more easily applied to groups of items or composite scores. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1985
Accession Number
ADA167288

Entities

People

  • Karol Girdler

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Coefficients
  • Communities
  • Composite Materials
  • Correlation Analysis
  • Data Science
  • Equations
  • Factor Analysis
  • Families (Human)
  • High Reliability
  • Information Science
  • Job Satisfaction
  • Military Research
  • Quality Of Life
  • Regression Analysis
  • Reliability
  • Social Sciences
  • Surveys

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Geodesy
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.