Combat Engineer Equipment: Achilles Heel in the Offense.

Abstract

There is some question whether or not US Army combat engineers have the equipment necessary to provide mobility support to offensive operations as would be found in Air Land Battle. The current status of engineer equipment and its shortcomings are described. Recent trends in research, developmemt and acquisition of engineer equipment to provide counterobstacle and countermine support on the battlefield are discussed. The inability of engineeers to obtain the priority and funds needed to modernize their equipment is attributed to a general lack of understanding and appreciation of the necessity of engineer support in the offense. To counter this condition the need to retain the initiative in the offense, the nature of the Soviet threat, and weaknesses in realistic combat engineer combined arms training are cited. The conclusion is that weaknesses in combat engineering equipmemt can be overcome only with support of the other combat arms who must carefully weight the risks incurred during offensive operations if engineer equipment does not complement the modernize systems of the combined arms team. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 07, 1986
Accession Number
ADA170235

Entities

People

  • Frederick J. Charles Iii

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Battlefields
  • Bridges
  • Combat Vehicles
  • Crossings
  • Governments
  • Maneuvers
  • Minefields
  • Procurement
  • Second World War
  • Security
  • Training
  • Vehicles
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military Science
  • Systems Analysis and Design