Antitank Tactics for the Light Infantry: Can History Help?

Abstract

Although designed primarily for low intensity scenarios, the Light Infantry Divisions can also operate in mid-to-high intensity environments, if properly augmented, against an armor threat. But, what if the light units are employed in the defense, without augmentation, against such a threat? This paper addresses the adequacy of current doctrine in providing guidance for this particular situation. The methodology includes an analysis of current and past doctrine as well as a study of lessons learned from selected battles in history. Basically, current doctrine provides ample guidance for Light Infantry commanders on utilization of terrain, deployment of units and weapons, and other actions to be taken during the preparation phase of the defense. However, it is lacking in its treatment of actions to be taken during the conduct of the defense. Specifically, current doctrine should be revised to address: command and control, engagement criteria and massing fires, offensive actions by the defender, and continuation of the defense when enemy tanks penetrate the defensive positions. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 07, 1986
Accession Number
ADA170450

Entities

People

  • Richard L. St. John

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anti-Tank Guns
  • Anti-Tank Weapons
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Artillery
  • California
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Doctrine
  • Employment
  • Indirect Fire
  • Korean War
  • Lessons Learned
  • Management Personnel
  • New York
  • Schools
  • Warfare
  • Warning Systems

Readers

  • Military Science
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control