Hospital Credentials Action and Due Process: A Framework for Fairness.

Abstract

During the past two decades, economic and social pressures have produced significant changes in the delivery of health care in the United States. Hospitals, in particular, have experienced a dramatic evolution in their responsibilities. Court rulings in the 1960s, that hospital governing bodies have the duty to monitor health care and prevent harm to patients, have received broad judicial acceptance.1 Legislative, executive and professional recognition of this duty followed and is today evidenced by state licensure statutes, Medicare and Medicaid regulations and the standards of the joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. No longer seen as simply providing working space for physicians, hospitals are now expected to be active participants in the effort to provide only quality health care. To meet this obligation, hospitals must have a well conceived, effective system of selecting, monitoring and disciplining medical staff members. This is a function of the physician credentialing process. Adverse credentials action, usually in the form of a denial, limitation, suspension or revocation of privileges, is a critical component of hospital quality assurance.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 30, 1986
Accession Number
ADA173759

Entities

People

  • William H. Archambault

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • California
  • Case Law
  • Governments
  • Health
  • Health Care
  • Health Services
  • Hospitals
  • Law
  • Medical Personnel
  • New Jersey
  • Patient Care
  • Physicians
  • Professional Associations
  • Public Health
  • Standards
  • Supreme Court
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Medicine
  • Political science

Readers

  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Medical or Health Care Field.
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Space