Fundamental Studies in Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics. Phase 1.

Abstract

The basic tenet of fracture mechanics is that the stress intensity factor, K, controls fracture and fatigue: here the former claim is critically examined. The underlying supporting argument - the original energy argument of Griffith and the more modern K-controlled region view - are considered. These considerations demonstrate that there are questionable assumptions in both, so that the viability of K as a damage parameter for fracture has to be established by the physical evidence. The first question then is whether or not the critical value of K, K sub Ic, is a material parameter: checking data shows it need not be. The second question is can the technology be usefully predictive, even in the most simple of situations: checking the data shows it to be unreliable in this role. At this time then, it remains to ask similar questions concerning the role of K in fatigue crack growth and, certainly for the monotonic loading case, develop alternatives: these are the objectives of the second phase of the program.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 07, 1986
Accession Number
ADA174493

Entities

People

  • G. B. Sinclair

Organizations

  • Carnegie Mellon University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Cartesian Coordinates
  • Construction
  • Elastic Properties
  • Engineering
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Fracture (Mechanics)
  • Geometry
  • Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanical Working
  • Mechanics
  • Numerical Analysis
  • Shear Modulus
  • Stress Intensity Factors
  • Stresses
  • Three Dimensional
  • Two Dimensional

Readers

  • Materials Science (Mechanical Engineering).
  • Systems Analysis and Design