Cost Allocation and Overpricing of Spare Parts.

Abstract

The thesis objective was to determine if it is feasible to treat spare parts in lieu of contracts as cost objectives in government spare parts contracts. A survey instrument was constructed to help answer the research question. Survey was administered to contractor representatives of 12 major defense companies. The analysis revealed that 5 defense contractors are presently treating spare parts as cost objectives and using a type of spare parts as cost objectives and using a type of spare parts accounting system as described in the survey instrument. The other 7 contractor respondents who do not treat spare parts as cost objectives were not favorable to this accounting treatment. Also within this group, most anticipated significant increases in accumulating contract costs in order to treat spare parts as cost objectives. The anticipated cost impact was less severe in estimating contract costs. The results of this exploratory research based on the limited data from a small number of large defense contractors supports the conclusion that treating spare parts as cost objectives is feasible for some companies. However, more detailed research is required to fully assess the impact and practicality of treating spare parts as cost objectives.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1986
Accession Number
ADA174540

Entities

People

  • Michael O. Yorke

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Business Administration
  • Contract Proposals
  • Contractors
  • Contracts
  • Costs
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Indirect Costs
  • Logistics
  • Manufacturing
  • Power Supplies
  • Procurement
  • Production
  • Spare Parts

Readers

  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Systems Analysis and Design