The Construction Contractor Performance Evaluation as a Control Mechanism.

Abstract

This thesis examined the Naval Facilities Engineering Command's current use of construction contractor performance evaluations (SF 1420) from the viewpoint of accepted control and measurement theory. Surveys of field contract administrators, supervisory civil engineers, field contract specialists, and construction contractors were completed to assess their use of and views about the evaluations. The study concluded that: (1) NAVFAC lacks standards of performance to describe the distinction between satisfactory, outstanding, and unsatisfactory performances; (2) Contractors are not generally aware of the evaluation process; (3) Evaluations are not used to provide contractors feedback; (4) Evaluators are not well trained; (5) Evaluations are not fully utilized; and (6) The data base of evaluation information is inadequate. The study recommends that: (1) NAVFAC issue a policy statement to contractors to clarify the evaluations uses, standards, and performance elements; (2) interim evaluations be issued to provide contractors feedback; (3) contractors receive copies of all their evaluations; (4) evaluators receive uniform training on completion of evaluations; (5) SF 1420 be modified to allow for a more specific evaluation. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1986
Accession Number
ADA177437

Entities

People

  • Steven R. Iselin

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Business Administration
  • Civil Engineering
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Classification
  • Commerce
  • Contractors
  • Contracts
  • Control Systems
  • Control Theory
  • Databases
  • Detectors
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Literature Surveys
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Small Business

Readers

  • Facility/Structural Engineering.
  • Government Contracting/Procurement.
  • Systems Analysis and Design