War Planning Assumptions and Errors in Military Strategy

Abstract

This paper analyzes and assesses opposing strategies at Guadalcanal and at Dien Bien Phu. The analysis shows basic strategy, highlights key planning assumptions, and identifies force structures. The author concludes that battles are lost and campaigns fail because commanders make classic, but avoidable, errors in military thinking from which come the faulty planning assumptions upon which their losing strategies are based. He shows that Japan failed to hold Guadalcanal because the Imperial General HQ did not have an integrated strategy for defense of the southeast perimeter of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere and it chose positions in the southern Solomons that over-reached the range of land-based air power. He concludes that the French beat themselves at Dien Bien Phu because they: lost sight of any clear war aims in Indochina; underestimated the capabilities of the Viet Minh; overestimated their own capabilities while ignoring significant limitations on their own military power; did not to use advantage the terrain on which they chose to accept battle; and failed to plan adequately for retreat.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1986
Accession Number
ADA177846

Entities

People

  • Gale E. Heaivilin

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Amphibious Operations
  • Artillery
  • Boats
  • Governments
  • Marine Transportation
  • Military Organizations
  • National Security
  • Naval Operations
  • Navy
  • New York
  • Second World War
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military Science