The United States Army Wartime Replacement System: Can it Maintain Cohesion in Our Tactical Units

Abstract

One of the most fundamental elements in developing combat power in tactical units is cohesion. In wartime, most armines have sought to enhance unit cohesion in order to increase their combat power. Historically armies have found that their wartime replacement system is the critical link between raw manpower and cohesive fighting units. This monograph describes the challenge faced by modern armies which must attempt to maintain tactical unit cohesion in the face of relentless combat attrition. The historical examples of the American and German Armies in World War II are examined to determine what effects their respective replacement systems had on unit cohesion. The current U.S. Army wartime replacement system is examined to determine if it is structured to maintain tactical unit cohesion in wartime. The conclusions of this monograph suggest that U.S. Army replacement system has not in the past and cannot in the future maintain unit cohesion in wartime. Five specific conclusions suggest ways in which the army might improve its wartime replacement system, enabling it to foster unit cohesion at the tactical level. Keywords: Combat efficiency; Combat forces; Combat support; Combat effectiveness; Replacement.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1986
Accession Number
ADA179218

Entities

People

  • William S. Knightly

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Casualties
  • Combat Forces
  • Combat Operations
  • Doctrine
  • Field Army
  • Health Services
  • Infantry
  • International Organizations
  • Leadership
  • Management Personnel
  • Second World War
  • Social Psychology
  • Students
  • United States
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Engineering

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Military Mobilization and Reserve Forces Studies.