On the Accuracy of Finite Element and Finite Difference Predictions of Non-Newtonian Slot Pressures for a Maxwell Fluid.

Abstract

Plane slow flow of a Maxwell fluid over a transverse slot is considered. Results are computed by a finite difference method (FDM) using the differential form of the constitutive equation, and by a finite element method (FEM) using the integral form. Even on fine grids, the two methods produce different results, particularly at low D sub e. However, extrapolation of the results to zero mesh spacing shows excellent agreement between the two methods. Hence both methods are convergent with mesh refinement, but high accuracy would require extremely fine meshes. An explanation is provided for why it is unreasonable to expert either method accurately to obtain the singular limit of P sub e/N sub 1 as D sub e approaches limit of 0. Also an explanation for the errors at very low D sub e is offered. If we presume the second-order fluid (SOE) result holds for very low D sub e (i. e. P sub e = N sub 1/4), both the FEM and FDM predict only minor deviation from this value for the Maxwell fluid, in the range < or = sub e < or =.

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1986
Accession Number
ADA180768

Entities

People

  • David S. Malkus
  • Michael F. Webster

Organizations

  • University of Wisconsin–Madison

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Agreements
  • Constitutive Equations
  • Differential Equations
  • Equations
  • Equations Of State
  • Errors
  • Extrapolation
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Integrals
  • Mathematical Analysis
  • Mathematics
  • Transverse

Fields of Study

  • Physics

Readers

  • Combustion and Flow Dynamics.
  • Finite Element Method (FEM) for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Space