A Comparison of Air Force Versus Federal Aviation Administration Airframe Structural Qualification Criteria: MIL-A-87221 (USAF) Versus FAR Parts 23 and 25

Abstract

Air Force acquisitions of 'off-the-self' commercially developed aircraft for use in cargo, tanker, transport, and trainer roles have made it essential that the capability be developed within Aeronautical Systems Division acquisition organizations to evaluate commercially developed aircraft designs for adequacy in meeting Air Force requirements. Development of this capability to evaluate commercial aircraft designs has been complicated by a lack of understanding of the differences in the design approaches embodied in Air Force and Federal Aviation Administration airframe qualification procedures. This report is intended to provide an insight into Federal Aviation Regulation Parts 23 and 25, the FAA regulations which govern airplane qualification and certification, including airframe structures. This report is intended primarily for use by ASD engineers familiar with Air Force regulations and specifications governing aircraft structural design, particularly MIL-A-87221(USAF).

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 1986
Accession Number
ADA180922

Entities

People

  • James E. Ellis
  • Patrick J. Long

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aeroelasticity
  • Aircrafts
  • Airframes
  • Casting (Fabrication)
  • Castings
  • Control Systems
  • Damage
  • Damage Tolerance
  • Engineers
  • Government Procurement
  • Mechanics
  • Noise
  • Refueling
  • Resilience
  • Speed
  • Vibration
  • Weight

Readers

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Software Engineering