U.S. Army Armor in Limited War: Armor Employment Techniques in Korea and Vietnam

Abstract

Since the 1940's the United States Army's doctrine for the employment of its armor forces has oriented toward a World War II-style conflict against a conventionally equipped opponent in a general war on the European continent. However, the two major wars that the United States has fought since then - the Korean War and the war in Vietnam - have been limited wars fought against non- mechanized forces in countries with armor-restricting terrain, Initially, these conditions seemed to indicate that armor units would not be able to fight very effectively and might not even be necessary, particularly in Vietnam. Furthermore, American policies in both wars created constraints on the ability of U.S. armor units to use tanks and mechanized forces in their doctrinal roles of exploitation and pursuit, especially in the latter stages of the Korean War. Faced with unfamiliar conditions, armor units in both Korea and Vietnam adjusted quickly and developed new tactical employment techniques that contributed significantly, though not decisively, to the effectiveness of American combat operations in each war.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 29, 1987
Accession Number
ADA181423

Entities

People

  • David A. Niedringhaus

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Power
  • Anti-Tank Weapons
  • Armored Personnel Carriers
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Artillery
  • Combat Forces
  • Combat Operations
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Indirect Fire
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Personnel Management
  • United States
  • Vietnam War
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military Science and Technology Research and Modernization.
  • Military and Counterinsurgency Studies.
  • Strategic Security Studies