Validation, Error, and Simplification of Decision Technology.

Abstract

This report summarizes the research conducted under ARPA Contract No. N00014-79-C-0038. We examined the general topics of validation of multiattribute utility elicitation techniques, error in human preference judgment and simplification of assessment. Both theoretical and empirical work is discussed. Experimental work showed that existing methods of elicitation of multiattribute utility weight judgments are valid in that they compare favorably with an external criterion. This was found to be true with both student subjects in a contrived laboratory setting and with expert subjects working in the area of their expertise. Theoretical work showed several paths to simplification of elicitation. Using the functional relationships between risky and riskless utility elicitation procedures, one study showed that with a few simple assumptions holding, the much simpler riskless assessment techniques must maintain the preference ordering implied by the more complex procedures. A second theoretical study defined conditions under which various simplifying weighting strategies can be expected to do well in terms of replicating the preferences indicated by more complex elicitations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1980
Accession Number
ADA182906

Entities

People

  • Ward Edwards
  • William G. Stillwell

Organizations

  • University of Southern California

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • California
  • Contracts
  • Department Of Defense
  • Governments
  • Judgment
  • Military Research
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • Public Administration
  • Social Problems
  • Social Sciences
  • Students
  • Systems Engineering
  • Training
  • United States
  • Universities
  • Validation

Readers

  • Applied Combinatorial Optimization and Logic Circuit Design.
  • Regression Analysis.
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.