Analysis of Feedback in after Action Reviews

Abstract

The After Action Review (AAR) process was analyzed to evaluate the adherence to principles of effective feedback. Principles were identified through synthesis of the feedback literature and organized into three areas: feedback sources (participation), feedback content, and feedback message structures. Message content analysis was performed on six videotapes from the Army Training Battle Simulation System (ARTBASS) AARs. The results indicated that both effective and ineffective feedback behaviors occurred. The major ineffective procedure was the AAR leader's infrequent use of the questioning technique to stimulate involvement by the training audience. Other AAR feedback practices are discussed.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1987
Accession Number
ADA188336

Entities

People

  • Cal W. Downs
  • Jon J. Fallesen
  • Kenneth M. Johnson

Organizations

  • University of Kansas

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Applied Psychology
  • Army Training
  • Command And Control
  • Educational Psychology
  • Fire Support
  • Information Processing
  • Literature
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Research
  • Military Training
  • Psychology
  • Simulations
  • Social Sciences
  • Task Forces
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Video Tapes

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation