Searching for the Stronger Form of War in the 20th Century: The Defense or the Offense

Abstract

A key theoretical proposition offered by Clausewitz in On War was that the defense was the stronger form of war over the offense. Members of the military, theorists, and historians have intermittently grappled with this proposition and have tended to reach conclusions flawed by poor analytic methodology or by the manipulation of Clausewitzian criteria. One would be distorting the very essence of Clausewitz to suggest one form of war always maintained an advantage over the other. Even when discussing the offense and defense Clausewitz recognized that the relationship of one to the other was situationally dependent. The purpose of this study is not to redefine, manipulate, or interpret any new criteria to determine which form of warfare is the stronger but rather to use the model developed by Clausewitz which he utilized to support his thesis in favor of the defense and find if it is applicable to 20 century tactical warfare. Keywords: Surprise, Terrain, Concentic attack, Initiative, Waiting time, Strategies.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 05, 1987
Accession Number
ADA191401

Entities

People

  • Oliver J. Moss Iii

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Aircrafts
  • Ammunition Fragments
  • Artillery
  • Classification
  • Command And Control
  • Doctrine
  • Guns
  • International Organizations
  • Machine Guns
  • New York
  • Second World War
  • Security
  • Tactical Warfare
  • War
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Strategic Security Studies
  • Theoretical Analysis.