Planning and Analysis: Where's the Beef.

Abstract

The Air Force needs to place increased emphasis on systems analysis as it plans, inside and outside the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS). The current antipathy between military planners (operational judgment school) and systems analysts (quantitative analysis school) must be resolved. The operator/analyst, embodied in the mission area analysis (MAA) concept, can integrate the two schools of thought and produce meaningful analysis. In so doing, three rules must be observed. First, the analysis must be understandable (the Aunt Martha test), objective (no advocacy), and through (pros and cons). This is particularly true in Air Force relations with Congress where decreasing military experience among members places a premium on quality of information. The potential of systems analysis is clearly demonstrated in the continuing strategic bomber debate. In the mid-seventies, the debate centered on the procurement decision for the B-1. In the 1980 the question has been whether President Reagan's two-bomber approach was and is appropriate. In both cases, systems analysis played a pivotal role.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1988
Accession Number
ADA192534

Entities

People

  • Jack E. Leonard

Organizations

  • Air Command and Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Budgets
  • Costs
  • Defense Planning
  • Military Budgets
  • Military Education
  • Military Operations
  • Military Planning
  • Military Requirements
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Operations Research
  • Procurement
  • Schools
  • Students
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Logistics and Supply Chain Management.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Systems Analysis and Design