Armor in Low Intensity Conflict: What is the Best Tactical Doctrine for Armor in Counterinsurgency?

Abstract

This study is a tactical analysis of armor in low intensity conflict. The study begins with a discussion of the theory of armor in LIC. This monograph uses J.F.C. Fuller's five combat functions: protect, find, fix, hit, and destroy, to examine the proper role of armor. Vietnam and Afghanistan are analyzed as case studies of the employment of mechanized forces in counterinsurgency. The results of this analysis are then compared to current doctrine. The study concludes that the most appropriate tactical doctrine for armor in LIC depend upon the combat function it serves within the combined arms team. These functions can vary with terrain, organization, and the operational plan. Mechanized forces are best employed in small cordon search operations from battalion to brigade size. Their mobility and firepower are best used in encirclement operations or as a reaction force. Finally, the near term and future implications of this study are considered under Fuller's combat functions.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 07, 1987
Accession Number
ADA193292

Entities

People

  • Michael R. Matheny

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Armored Vehicles
  • Combat Operations
  • Combat Vehicles
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Guns
  • Helicopters
  • Indirect Fire
  • Machine Guns
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • New York
  • Special Operations Forces
  • Terrorists
  • Urban Areas
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies